Court prevents the state from requiring proof of Covid-19 vaccination while seeking in-person government services
The High Court issued an order halting the government’s directive requiring everyone seeking in-person government services such as education to be fully vaccinated.
On November 21, Kagwe, along with CS Tourism Najib Balala, issued directives requiring everyone seeking in-person government services to be fully vaccinated and provide proof of vaccination by December 21.
KRA services, education, immigration services, hospital and prison visits, NTSA and port services are examples of such services.
While visiting some of these facilities, Kenyans were also required to show proof of vaccination. However, in a ruling issued on Wednesday, Justice Anthony Mrima issued the order and ordered that the case be heard on January 4.
The order was granted in response to an application filed by Enock Aura, who claimed that the Kenyan government had entered into highly secretive agreements with international pharmaceutical companies for the sale of covid-19 vaccines.
Enock Aura stated that CS Health Mutahi Kagwe is aware of this information and has also failed to disclose to Kenyans the exact contents of such ‘covid-19 vaccines’ syringes.
In court documents, Aura expresses grave concern about an undocumented slew of long-term, medium-term, and short-term side effects, including fatalities, caused by the administration of covid-19 vaccines to Kenyans.
“CS Mutahi Kagwe has not disclosed to the Kenyan population what exactly is contained in the covid-19 vaccines, or possible side effects, which are now being administered,” Aura said.
Aura argued, through lawyer Harrison Kinyanjui, that every Kenyan has the right to protect their health and safety.
He claims that the deliberate concealment of data on the contents, effects, longevity, or even undisclosed purposes of vaccines across the board indicates a lack of relevant information to Kenyans about the adverse effects of vaccinations and who specifically bears the arising liability for the administration of such ‘vaccines’ on Kenyans.
Aura has challenged this directive, claiming that it is not in Kenyans’ best interests.
According to Aura, no evidence exists from any source to determine how long immunity from an administered covid-19 vaccine would take to protect an injected individual.
He claims that Kenya will most likely become like Israel, where they will receive endless booster shots in addition to the stated initial two injections.
He also claims that there is insufficient national cross-sectional data on whether current vaccines marketed as covid-19 vaccines are safe for pregnant women, children, the disabled, those with terminal illnesses such as advanced cancer, and those with compromised immune systems for any medical reason.
Also Read:
- Student Loans In Kenya And Where To Find Them
- Sacco: 7 Factors To Consider Before Joining Sacco
- 8 Factors to Consider When Choosing a Career Path
- Why Most Scholarship Applications Are Rejected
- Writing Scholarship Essays: Frequently Asked Questions
CS Health, CS Transport, the inter-faith council on the national response to the coronavirus pandemic, the Inspector General of Police, the Council of Governors, the Pharmacy and Poisons Board, and the Attorney General were all named as defendants in the case.
